July 21, 2008
In the Matter of a Mail
Dispute Between
LAURA KRUSE
&
JOHN AND DOROTHY WILLIS
and
DANIEL KRUSE
P.S. Docket No. MD 08-147
APPEARANCE
FOR DISPUTANT
LAURA KRUSE:
APPEARANCE FOR DISPUTANTS
JOHN AND DOROTHY WILLIS:
APPEARANCE FOR DISPUTANT .
DANIEL KRUSE:
POSTAL SERVICE DECISION
On
Disputants
John and Dorothy Willis and Laura Kruse have not shown that the Initial
Decision is clearly erroneous or that any other grounds exist for the Judicial
Officer to exercise his discretion to grant review on appeal. In their appeal, Disputants John and Dorothy
Willis and Laura Kruse request a hearing to present evidence regarding
Disputant Laura Kruse's involvement in the disputed companies. The applicable rules of practice, 39 C.F.R.
Part 965, do not provide for a hearing on appeal. Furthermore, the parties were provided a full
opportunity to present evidence to the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Disputants John and Dorothy Willis and Laura
Kruse have not shown that the evidence they wish to present is newly discovered
or was otherwise unavailable for presentation to the Administrative Law Judge,
or that they were not properly notified they could present such evidence in the
initial proceeding. The request for a
hearing is denied and no further evidence will be considered.
Moreover, Disputants
John and Dorothy Willis and Laura Kruse's dissatisfaction with the order issued
by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, MO and their contention that it was
not properly issued are not appropriate issues for decision in this mail
dispute proceeding. The purpose of these
proceedings is only to determine and direct the delivery of the disputed mail. If Disputants John and Dorothy Willis and
Laura Kruse wish to challenge the court order, they must do so in the proper
forum. If a further court order
directing delivery of the mail is issued, postal regulations provide that the mail
will be delivered in accordance with such order (Postal Operations Manual,
§616.3).
Since the Judicial Officer has determined he will not exercise his discretion to grant review on appeal, the Initial Decision is now final under 39 C.F.R. §965.12. The parties are once again reminded that this decision determines only the right to delivery of the mail in dispute not the ownership of the mail. If either party receives mail intended for the other, that party is responsible for forwarding such mail to the intended recipient.
William A. Campbell
Judicial Officer