United States Postal Service(TM) 


 In the Matter of the Complaint Against ) November 19, 1993
                                        )
 SYSTCOM BUSINESS YELLOW PAGES          )
 Systcom Classified Dept.               )
 163 3rd Avenue                         )
 Suite 343                              )
 New York, NY  10003-2536               )
                                        )
 LLOYD PRUDENZA                         )
 163 3rd Avenue                         )
 Suite 343                              )
 New York, NY  10003-2536               ) P.S. Docket No. 40/105

 APPEARANCE FOR COMPLAINANT:            Daniel S. Bryant
 Consumer Protection Law
 Law Department
 United States Postal Service
 Washington, DC  20260-1147

 APPEARANCE FOR RESPONDENT:             None

POSTAL SERVICE DECISION

ON PETITION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ORDERS

Prior proceedings in this matter led to the issuance of False Representation Order No. 93-17 and Cease and Desist Order No. CD-3607 against Respondents. On September 3, 1993, Complainant filed a Petition for supplemental Orders, with supporting documentation, alleging that Respondents are evading or attempting to evade the provisions of the False Representation Order and Cease and Desist Order. According to Complainant, Respondents are currently conducting the same or a similar scheme under the name Classified Directory Publishers at 217 E. 86th Street, Suite 370, New York, NY 10028-3617. Complainant requests that a supplemental False Representation Order be issued against this name and address.

By Notice dated September 7, 1993, Respondents were advised that if they intended to oppose the issuance of the Order requested in the Petition they should file their Answer no later than ten calendar days from the date of receipt of the Petition. No Answer to the Petition has been filed within the time allowed, or as of the date of this Decision.

By the Petition and the attachments thereto, a prima facie showing has been made that Respondents are evading or attempting to evade the provisions of False Representation Order No. 93-17 and Cease and Desist Order No. 3607 by conducting the same or a similar scheme under a different name and at a different address. Accordingly, a supplemental False Representation Order against Respondents under the name and at the address alleged in the Petition is issued with this Decision.