United States Postal Service(TM)


 In the Matter of the Complaint Against     ) January 18, 1985
 					    )
 MARKETING WORKSHOP, INC. 		    )
 FLAGSHIP INTERNATIONAL 		    )
 800 N. Clark Bldg., Suite 424-427 	    )
 at 					    )
 Chicago, IL 606l0-32l2 		    )
 and 					    )
 EILEEN AVANZINO 			    )
 TONY AVANZINO 				    )
 l737 N. North Park Avenue 		    )
 at 					    )
 Chicago, IL 606l4-5747 		    ) P.S. Docket No. 19/90
 
 APPEARANCE FOR RESPONDENT: 		    Eileen Avanzino

 APPEARANCE FOR COMPLAINANT: 		    Thoma s A. Ziebarth, Esq.
					    Consumer Protection Division
					    Law Department
					    United States Postal Service
					    Washington, DC 20260-lll2. 

					    Tony Avanzino 
					    2520 N. Lincoln
					    P.O. Box l03
					    Chicago, IL 606l4-2392

POSTAL SERVICE DECISION

ON BREACH OF CONSENT AGREEMENT

On December l8, l984, Complainant filed a Petition alleging that Respondents have breached the terms of an Agreement Contain ing Consent Order to Cease and Desist dated July l2, l984, exe cuted by Eileen and Tony Avanzino, individually and as officers of Marketing Workshop, Inc., Flagship International. Complainant contends that Respondents have resumed promoting their lottery activities under a program known as "Eileen's Own" and are making the representations which, in the Agreement Containing Consent Order to Cease and Desist, they agreed to discontinue. Complain ant also contends that Respondents have failed to make refunds and to furnish their new promotional materials to Complainant prior to publication, as they were required to do under the terms of the Agreement. The names and addresses against which Complainant seeks the issuance of orders are: MEGA-MARKETING, INC, MARKETING WORKSHOP, INC., FLAGSHIP INTERNATIONAL, 800 N. Clark Building, Suite 424-427, Chicago, IL 606l0-32l2 and EILEEN AVANZINO, OWNER, MARKETING WORKSHOP, INC., MEGA-MARKETING, INC, 2520 N. Lincoln, P. O. Box l03, Chicago, IL 606l4-2392.

On December 20, l984, an interim detention order as provided for in paragraph 9 of the Agreement containing Consent Order to Cease and Desist was issued against Respondents. The interim detention order granted Respondents a period of ten days in which to file a reply to the Petition. No reply has been filed by Respondents. In the absence of a reply, the allegations of the Petition are deemed to be admitted. These allegations, which are supported by the attachments to the Petition, make a prima facie showing that Respondents have breached the terms of the Agreement containing Consent Order to Cease and Desist in the manner alleged in the Petition.

Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Consent Agreement, an Order under 39 U.S.C. Section 3005 is being issued with this Decision.

James A. Cohen Judicial Officer

WORLD-WI.351