United States Postal Service 2000 Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations Table of Contents Chapter One Compliance with Statutory Policies A. Fundamental Service to the People (39.U.S.C. 101(a)) 1. General 2. Board of Governors 3. Strategic Planning 4. Quality 5. Diversity B. Service to Small or Rural Communities (39 U.S.C. 101(b)) C. Employee Compensation and Career Advancement (39 U.S.C. 101(c)) 1. Collective Bargaining 2. Personnel 3. Compensation and Benefits 4. Employee Development 5. Selection, Evaluation and Recognition 6. Workplace Environment Improvement D. Postal Cost Apportionment and Postal Ratemaking Developments (39 U.S.C. 101(d)) 1. Omnibus Rate Case 2. Other litigation E. Transportation Policies (39 U.S.C. 101(e),(f)) 1. General 2. Domestic Transportation 3. International Transportation 4. Postal-Owned Transportation 5. Mail Transport Equipment F. Postal Facilities, Equipment and Employee Working Conditions (39 U.S.C. 101(g)) 1. Safety and Health - Safety Management Process 2. Environmental Programs 3. Total Resource Management 4. Facilities 5. Purchasing and Materials Chapter Two Postal Operations A. Public Perceptions, Customers Outreach and Mailer Liaison 1. Customer Feedback Analysis 2. Customer Outreach and Mailer Liaison B. Mail Volume and Service Performance 1. Mail Volume 2. Service Performance Measurement 3. International Mail C. Mail Distribution 1. Automation Activities 2. Remote Encoding Centers 3. Process Improvements 4. Material Handling 5. Integrated Processing Facility 6. Support Systems for Mail Processing D. Delivery Unit Operations 1. Delivery Point Sequencing 2. Delivery Operations Information System 3. Mobile Data Collection Device E. Retail Programs 1. Marketing Calendar 2. Retail Sales 3. Point-of-Service One 4. Retail Workforce Strategies 5. Plan for Retail Operations Performance 6. Postage Technology Initiatives 7. Self Service F. Marketing Technology and Channel Management G. Pricing and Product Design 1. Periodicals Cost Reduction Effort 2. Business Mail 101 H. Electronic Commerce 1. Our Web Presence... www.usps.com 2. Messaging Services 3. Online Payment Services 4. Bringing Choice to Our Customers I. Technology 1. Strategic Technology Initiatives 2. Information Technology Infrastructure 3. Information Technology Assessibility 4. Information Application Support J. Operations Planning 1. Staffing and Scheduling 2. Address Management Chapter Three Financial Highlights A. Financial Summary 1. Revenue 2. Expenses 3. Net Loss 4. Financing B. Productivity 1. Total Factor Productivity 2. TFP, 2000 and the Future Plan 3. TFP, Benchmark Measures 4. TFP, Additional Considerations C. Federal Government Appropriations D. Breast Cancer Semipostal Research Stamp Chapter Four Preliminary 2002 Annual Performance Plan Chapter Five 2000 Performance Report All reference to "2000" or "the year" refer to the government fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies A. Fundamental Service to the People (39 U.S.C 101 (a)) 1. General It began with a successful rollover to the new century. Years of preparation paid off. When the year 2000 arrived, the mail kept moving and finan-cial data and other key information systems remained intact. Postal Service employees continued to deliver record-breaking performance in customer service and in overnight delivery of First-Class Mail. Those successes translated to immediate benefit for our customers. Customer satisfaction measurements revealed that 92 percent of households surveyed rated their level of satisfaction with the Postal Service as "good," "very good" or "excellent." And, independ-ently measured delivery scores continued to rise, with a high 94 percent of local First-Class Mail delivered on time for the year. The Vice President's Commission on Reinventing Government awarded the Postal Service the prestigious Hammer Award for achievement in diversity. Fortune magazine mir-rored that sentiment by placing the Postal Service among the top ten best workplaces for minorities. Those successes fueled our efforts and helped to expand the scope of our multicultural initiatives. Throughout the year, we sought to reach under-represented markets through advertising and product specialization. We contracted help from three advertising agencies known for their expertise in reaching specialty markets, including African Americans, Hispanic Americans and Asian Americans. And, we successfully launched our newest web-site, www.usps.com/correo. Written entirely in the Spanish language, the website gives our Spanish-speaking customers access to the full range of services and employment opportunities offered by the Postal Service. We've embraced electronic technology and began providing the Internet-based products and services our customers demanded with the launch of our premier website, www.usps.com. Since its inception, we've continuously expanded our electronic services lineup. It now includes the following: Postal Service eBillPay, an electronic bill pre-sentment and payment service for individuals and businesses, too. NetPost Mailing Online, a service that brings the convenience of letter shop operations to consumers' home computers. It allows users to electronically transmit their (First-Class Mail and Standard Mail (A)) in the form of documents, correspondence and newsletters, along with their mailing lists, to the Postal Service via our website at www.usps.com. The electronic files are securely distributed to printers who print, insert, add postage, sort and transport the mailings to the nearest Post Office for processing and delivery. The Postal Store, a virtual retail outlet that brings the speed and convenience of secure on-line shipping to customers looking to buy postage and other postal products. And the most recent addition, Netpost CardStore, is an Internet-based service, designed to make sending high-quality, personalized greeting cards easier and less time-consuming. Its primary focus is business-to-business and business-to-con-sumer greeting cards, but consumers can send their individual greeting cards, too. With each electronic service initiative, we've sought to provide convenient, high-value Internet-based services for our customers, while reaffirming the relevancy of traditional, hard copy mail. So far we've been successful. We are also working to build an organization of operational excellence. We are continuing our Breakthrough Productivity Initiative to centralize functions, eliminate duplication and reduce administrative staffing. This will help us to cut sig-nificant costs from our system. Despite these efforts, an increasingly competitive communica-tions market and our existing regulatory environment are working together to create an increasingly difficult financial outlook for the Postal Service. With the continued expansion of electronic communications, forecasts call for signif-icant diversions of First-Class Mail to other media. We are also experiencing changes in the patterns of mail volume growth, with a shift away from higher-contribution products such as First-Class Mail to Standard Mail, which makes a smaller con-tribution to our overhead. In addition, a labor arbitration process that does not consider the needs of our customers has contributed to a situation in which salaries are growing at a rate that exceeds both our revenue and inflation. 2. Board of Governors As the governing body of the United States Postal Service, the 11-member Board of Governors 2000 Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations|1 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 1•has responsibilities comparable to a board of direc-tors of a publicly held corporation. The Board is composed of nine Governors appointed by the President of the United States with advice and consent of the Senate, the Postmaster General and the Deputy Postmaster General. The Governors appoint the Postmaster General who serves at their pleasure without a specific term of office. The Governors, together with the Postmaster General, appoint the Deputy Postmaster General (39 U.S.C. 202). The Board meets on a regular basis and, at the annual meeting in January, the chairman is elected by the Governors from among all members of the Board. The vice chairman is elected by the full Board. The Board directs the exercise of the power of the Postal Service. It establishes policies, basic objec-tives and long-range goals for the Postal Service in accordance with Title 39 of the United States Code. Except for those powers specifically vested in the Governors, the Board may delegate the authority vested in it by statute to the Postmaster General under such terms, conditions and limitations including the power of redelegation, as it deems desirable (39 U.S.C. 402). The Governors are authorized to establish reasonable and equitable classes of mail and reasonable and equitable rates of postage and fees for postal service (39 U.S.C. 3621). A specific power reserved by statute for the Governors alone is to approve, allow under protest, reject or, by unanimous written decision, modify recommended decisions of the Postal Rate Commission on postal rate and mail classification changes (39 U.S.C. 3625). During 2000, the Board held regular monthly meetings for a total of 24 days. Eight of the regular monthly meetings were held in Washington, DC. Another four in cities across the country gave Board members an opportunity to meet mailers and employees, hear their concerns, visit postal facilities and observe new technology. The Board had four standing committees: Audit, Capital Projects, Compensation and Strategic Planning. The committees hold regularly scheduled meetings during the year to consider matters within their areas of responsibility and refer items to the full Board for consideration. A number of these meetings were held prior to the scheduled Board meetings to facilitate action on committee activities. In October 1999, the Board approved the 2000 Economic Value Added (EVA) Variable Pay Program and a resolution designating the number of authorized Assistant Postmasters General/Vice Presidents. They also approved their meeting schedule for 2000 and the budget of the Office of the Governors. In November 1999, the Governors approved the Recommended Decision of the Postal Rate Commission for Weighted-Averaged, Nonletter-Sized Business Reply Mail in Docket No. MC99-2. The Board approved a resolution setting February 6, 2000, as the effective date for the new classification and fees. The Board also approved filing with the Postal Rate Commission an Exper-imental Classification for Mailing Online and extending the contract for external audit services for one year. The Governors approved the 2000 Performance Plan for the Office of Inspector General. In December 1999, the Board approved the 1999 audited financial statements and 1999 Annual Report. The Board also held a special meeting on succession planning by conference call in December. In January 2000, the Board approved the filing of an Omnibus Rate case with the Postal Rate Commission. The Governors approved a res-olution relative to the Postmaster General's salary and the Board approved a resolution on capital funding. The Board also approved the annual report to Congress in compliance with the Government in the Sunshine Act. The Governors elected Einar V. Dyhrkopp as Chairman of the Boardand the Board elected Robert F. Rider as Vice Chairman for 2000. In February, the Board approved both the 1999 Annual Performance Report and the 2001 Preliminary Annual Performance Plan, in compli-ance with the Government Performance and Results Act. The Board also approved the transmis-sion of the Annual Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations to Congress. The Governors approved the Postal Rate Commission's Recommended Decision in Docket No. MC00-1, Experimental Ride-Along Periodicals Classification Change. The Board approved an implementation date of February 26, 2000, for the change. In March, the Board reviewed the prelimi-nary plans relative to electronic commerce and the use of the Internet to meet customer demands. In April, the Board approved the offering of ePayment services through the Internet. The Board also approved an Audit Resolution Process for reports from the Office of Inspector General. In May, the Board approved a resolution on International Postage Rates for three categories of surface printed matter. The Board approved a reso-2| 2000 Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations| Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 2•lution on Compensation and Benefits for Officers of the Postal Service that strengthened the approval and administration of relocation benefits. The Board approved the Chief Inspector's Semiannual Report to Congress on the summary of investiga-tive activities in accordance with the Mail Order Consumer Protection Amendments of 1983. In June, the Governors rejected the Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision in Docket No. C99-4, Complaint of Continuity Shippers Association. The Board approved a resolution for the consideration of eCommerce initiatives. The Board approved a resolution for an updated Charter of the Audit Committee that was based on rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the exchanges and the Auditing Standards Board. In July, the Board approved a resolution on Capital Funding that added developmental real estate projects to those requiring Board approval when a project exceeds $10 million. In August, the Governors approved the Decision on the Recommended Decision of the Postal Rate Commission in the Mailing Online Experiment, Docket No. MC2000-2. The Board approved a resolution with September 1, 2000, as the effective date of the new classification. The Board approved a resolution for Contingent Borrowing Authority. The authorized the exercise of the power of the Postal Service to borrow money under 39 U.S.C. 2005. The Board also approved a resolution expanding Priority Mail Global Guaran-teed Service to include non-documents shipments, effective October 1, 2000. In September, the Governors approved the 2001 budgets for the Office of Inspector General and the Postal Rate Commission. The Board approved a public notice in the Federal Register for an International Rates Proposal. The Board also approved transmittal of the Five-Year Strategic Plan in compliance with the Government Performance and Results Act. During the year, the Board considered and approved 22 capital investment proposals costing $10 million or more. Funding was approved for seven automation-related projects, including some that increased readability and throughput of auto-mated equipment. Systems approved included automated induction units for secondary parcel sorting machines, upgrade of optical character reader equipment, automated flat sorting machines, expanded capability for delivery and carrier sequence bar code sorters, control modifications for small parcel and bundle sorters upgrade readers and feeders for flat sorting machines. Eight facility proj-ects were approved, including Twin Cities Air Mail Center, St. Paul, MN; new lease for Midtown Station and additional funding for Ansonia Station, New York, NY; expansion of the Los Angeles Bulk Mail Center; Priority Mail Center, Phoenix, AZ; Crossroads and Topaz Stations, Las Vegas, NV; advance site and design, Santa Monica, CA; and Air Mail Center expansion, San Francisco, CA. Five other projects were approved, including funds for Mailing Online, PostalOne!, POS ONE Stage 2B, Mail Evaluation, Readability and Lookup system (MERLIN)and delivery and collection vehi-cles. Two projects were approved as part of the information platform, including surface-air man-agement system and delivery operations information system. Governor Sam Winters, serving in his one-year extension, ended his term on the Board November 8, 2000. Alan Kessler was appointed to the Board on November 9, 2000. Governor Kessler's term expires in December 2008. The Board appointed John Nolan Deputy Postmaster General on February 5, 2000. 3. Strategic Planning The Office of Strategic Planning supports the Postmaster General and the Management Committee, within the policy framework set by the Board of Governors, in the development, approval and implementation of a Five-Year Strategic Plan, as required by the Government Performance and Results Act (GRPA). The Office is also responsible for preparing the GPRA-required preliminary and final Annual Performance Plans. The Office of Strategic Planning also assists the Strategic Planning Committee of the Board of Governors and the Management Committee in addressing long-term strategic issues and pro-vides support to the annual planning process. The office publishes an annual Business Environment Assessment (BEA) at the beginning of the annual planning cycle. Postal managers are updated on issues likely to impact the Postal Service in upcoming years and facilitates discussion with Postal Service stakeholders on the future of the Postal Service. a. The Five-Year Strategic Plan, Fiscal Year 2001-2005 The GPRA of 1993 required federal govern-ment agencies, including the Postal Service, to develop and submit to Congress and the President a five-year strategic plan. According to the statute, Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 3 3•this plan should outline the mission of the agency, describe the challenges faced by the organization and provide information on how the agency will address those challenges. Agencies also are required to provide the objectives, measures and targets that should be used to define success and evaluate progress. Finally, agencies need to involve their stakeholders in discussions on the objectives, strate-gies and measures. GPRA requires the Postal Service to update its Five Year Strategic Plan at least every three years. The previous strategic plan was provided to Congress and the President in September 1997. An updated plan, for 2001-2005, was provided in September 2000. The revised strategic plan repre-sents a summary of an ongoing process that involves extensive work by the Board of Governors, the Management Committee and postal stakeholders. The Postal Service is beset by an outdated regulatory model that limits flexibility in certain key areas critical to the organization's future suc-cess. We are seeking statutory reform that would provide a new regulatory model with increased pricing, product, labor and investment flexibility. The strategic plan underlines the importance of this goal as it addresses one of our fundamental challenges - the uncertainty about future mail volume growth as a result of changing technology. In the past, the Postal Service was able to forecast mail volume growth primarily based on assumptions about the growth of the U.S. economy. The widespread availability of the Internet in American homes and businesses and the development of Internet applications that may substitute for traditional postal applications, such as bill presentment and payment, suggest that business practices and consumer behavior may change in the future. The Postal Service recognizes that many external experts predict that such changes will cause mail volume to decline. The Postal Service is operating within an extremely volatile market environment with competitive pressures unlike any it has experi-enced in the past. While it is clear that these will likely contribute to a long-term, negative effect on mail volume and revenue, the organization must make strategic decisions for the future while operating within a changing marketplace. The plan identifies three major strategic challenges created by this environment. The first is the issue of affordability, or maintaining postal prices at competitive levels, subject to the break-even requirements of the Postal Reorganization Act. The postal response to this challenge is a set of strategies known as the "Blueprint for Progress: Breakthrough Productivity Initiatives," which have the goal of reducing costs by about $3-$4 billion over the next several years. The strategies include targeted reductions in overhead, overall postal employment, transportation and fuel costs and improvements in purchasing productivity. Other strategies focus on improving the Postal Service operating network and increasing pro-ductivity of current flat and package handing operations by implementing automation, mate-rials and handling, information processing and other technologies. A second major challenge is to identify oppor-tunities for the Postal Service to grow revenue to replace volume that may be lost to Internet-based applications such as electronic bill payment and presentment and e-mail interactive advertising. We are responding to this challenge in a number of ways. Our primary focus is maintaining and strengthening the value and relevance of our core products and services. We are doing this by main-taining high service levels, increasing ease of use and access and adding enhancements and features that position our core products as the right solu-tions for customer needs. We are also developing new electronic and Web-enabled services. The third challenge identified and described in the strategic plan is the need for the Postal Service to become more flexible, innovative and responsive to customer needs. This is a "vision" of change that will prepare the Postal Service for the future. However, such changes press the limits of the current regulatory and legislative structure established 30 years ago by the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970. The Postal Service is not only seeking signif-icant improvements in internal processes, but is also in need of more flexibility in developing and pricing services, investing and working with postal unions. The strategic plan introduced a framework, called "Gateway to the Household," which increases the focus on the traditional mission of the Postal Service to provide prompt, reliable services to all communities. The "Gateway to the Household" expands the internal focus on postal operations to include a more externally oriented "value chain" that includes mailers, the mailing industry and the attitudes and behaviors of recipi-ents of the mail. The future success of the Postal Service will depend on improvements across the 4 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 4•entire value chain as mail is increasingly subject to technological substitution and direct competition. The strategic plan describes the risks facing the Postal Service if the strategies for improving affordability, growth and flexibility are unsuc-cessful. The traditional mission and infrastructure of the Postal Service would be under severe pres-sure for change - change that may be disruptive and that the American public has shown no will-ingness to consider. b. Leadership Support The process of framing strategic issues, providing data and analysis, developing policy options and facilitating leadership discussions is an intensive and continuous process. Strategic Planning provides the necessary support to postal leadership efforts. Initiatives include providing management with timely and relevant "futures" seminars, industry and academic experts, strategic research and consulting support, scenario develop-ment and other programs that respond to the changing needs of postal management in a dynamic, competitive environment. c. The Business Environment Assessment (BEA) The BEA supports postal officers and execu-tives in the development of annual performance targets. The office integrates data provided by dif-ferent departments to create a report that establishes a common foundation for the develop-ment of functional plans. The BEA focuses on the impact of legislation and regulatory changes on the Postal Service, on changing technology and on trends in postal mar-kets. It also addresses changes in the economy and labor market and business practices or processes that may affect the Postal Service. The BEA is also used as a training tool in the development and mentoring of the next generation of postal leaders and as the basis for discussions with postal stakeholders about the future of the Postal Service. d. Stakeholder Outreach The Postal Service interacts with its stake-holders - employees, customers, the public, the mailing industry and the policy community - in a number of different ways. Many of these interac-tions often tend to be fairly specific and related to immediate, practical issues. In 2000, we conducted a major initiative to discuss long-term strategic issues about the future of the Postal Service with the different stakeholders. In the coming year, the Postal Service will extend these discussions, using the Internet to create broader and more interactive par-ticipation in the planning process. e. The Annual Performance Plan and the Annual Performance Report The Preliminary Annual Performance Plan for the Postal Service has been included with this Comprehensive Statement, as required by GPRA. This Performance Plan describes the goals, sub-goals, indicators, measures and preliminary targets for 2002, which begins October 2001. The targets are set each year after extensive consultation with both headquarters and field managers that takes place during the Deploy phase of the management cycle, which is completed near the end of each fiscal year. The preliminary targets are subject to change as data become available or as changes in the external environment force changes not foreseen during the planning process. The Postal Service will provide updated plans to Congress as necessary. Chapter 5 of this document is the Annual Performance Report required by GPRA. The Performance Report assesses the success of the Postal Service in achieving the targets outlined in the Annual Performance Plan. It is intended to provide the postal policy community with consis-tent, timely, relevant and accurate data to evaluate postal performance. f. Improving Postal Goals and the Planning Process Appendix 1 of the Postal Service Five-Year Strategic Plan, 2001-2005, describes the current planning process in detail. There is strong support for the annual management cycle and for the longer-term strategic planning process. The disci-pline provided by the process has led to such successes as increased customer approval ratings, overnight First-Class Mail service performance and successes in other targeted areas. However, the current process is likely to change over the next year to reflect the experience the Postal Service has gained over the past several years. This includes extensive research on GPRA practices of other agencies, benchmarking with academic experts and leading practitioners in the private sector and GAO evaluations of the Annual Plan and Performance Report. Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 5 5•4. Quality a. Quality Core Applications In 2000, a decision was made to phase out the Field Quality organization over the next three years. The Headquarters Quality staff resources normally devoted to field support, course develop-ment and instructor certification and Quality application support, have been reassigned to sup-port our corporate standardization efforts. The new, reduced Quality organization structure will bring greater focus to its activities. Our first Standardization initiative began with a partnership with the Vehicle Maintenance group, which wanted to standardize the Scheduled Main-tenance Process. This effort began in January 2000 and has progressed to the point where a national, standard Scheduled Maintenance process has been deployed to all ten Areas. This has driven greater performance levels and consistency in our Vehicle Maintenance facilities throughout the system. Another key opportunity to pilot our Standardization approach began early in the year in response to a request by the senior VP, Oper-ations, to help improve Priority Mail performance. The Quality Department developed a set of national indicators for Priority Mail that were rolled out nationally in October 2000. While the indicators were being developed and tested, Quality worked to designate national Process Owners for critical Priority Mail processes (e.g., Mail Prep, Manual Processing, Small Parcel and Bundle Sorter (SPBS) Processing, Flats Processing, etc.) these owners began to document the best-performing processes nationally using Quality's "Design Lite" approach. As of this writing, national standard process documentation for Mail Prep, Manual Processing and SPBS Processing will be deployed. Following the decision by senior management that Flats Processing was rapidly becoming a crit-ical area for the business, a similar standardization effort was launched on the deployment of the Automated Flat Sorting Machine 100s (AFSM) 100 automation equipment. The objective of this effort is to achieve the Productivity targets that this equipment is capable of achieving (i.e., approxi-mately 2,850 pieces per hour). In December, the Postal Service completed documentation of a stan-dard process for installing and operating the AFSM 100. Standardization is a strategic initiative that is intended to provide Operations personnel with well designed and capable processes that will, when operated properly, achieve the CustomerPerfect! tar-gets established by senior management. Achieving this level of integration of leader-ship's direction and the capability of our critical processes will greatly enhance the Postal Service's ability to achieve our strategic intent and simulta-neously drive much greater consistency and predictability in our service performance throughout our network. It also removes the burden from the field of having to develop process improvements independently in response to cor-porate performance targets, which is the practice today. While this has been successful in achieving sustained performance in First Class External Mail (EXFC)* scores, for instance, it is nevertheless time consuming and inefficient for 85 perform-ance clusters to pursue these improvements by themselves without the benefit of a national, stan-dard process developed, tested and proven capable by the responsible Headquarters function. Considering the daunting fiscal challenges the Postal Service is facing, Standardization is viewed as a key strategy for improving our service levels while the organization reduces its costs in the face of shrinking First-Class Mail volume. In 2000, because of severe revenue shortfalls and driven by the need to make significant cost reductions, the Field Quality organization was tar-geted to be phased out over the next three years by the Area Vice Presidents. The Headquarters Quality staff resources normally devoted to field support, course development and instructor certi-fication, as well as Quality application support, have therefore been reassigned to support our cor-porate Standardization efforts. b. Quality Development and Applications The application of Quality tools shifted emphasis from a role of identifying and mapping processes to one of using data to measure and ana-lyze process variation, stability and capability. Statistical Control tools were introduced to allow our managers to calculate and illustrate process control through the use of control charting. These higher level tools are more effective in giving our managers the information they need to manage the processes that make up our business. The use of process management skills was greatly expanded through the Quality Practitioner 6 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies * EXFC externally measures collection box to mailbox delivery performance. EXFC continuously tests a panel of 463 ZIP Code areas on the basis of geographic and volume density from which 90 percent of First-Class Mail volume originates and 80 percent destinates. EXFC is not a system-wide measurement of all First-Class Mail performance. 6•Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 7 program. Across the enterprise, over 600 Quality Practitioners were trained in the application of process management methods to increase the capa-bility of our internal and external processes. As a result of the 1997 Baldrige assessment, an initiative was undertaken to develop a strategy for identifying, collecting and using comparative data to evaluate Postal Service performance. This benchmarking methodology will allow us to com-pare internal standardized "best practices" for replication across the enterprise as well as to com-pare Postal Service documented processes against external world class methods as a means of accel-erating process improvement. Another area that received increased atten-tion was that of project/program management. The application of sound process management principles to the initiation and management of major programs resulted in the identification of a focused and disciplined approach to managing large integrated efforts. Use of this program man-agement process will ensure that major programs support the strategic objectives of the Postal Service, make best use of available resources, pro-vide integration of activities and establish accountability. A specialized project management training program also was established to facilitate implementation of this process. c. Quality-Enabling Applications Focus in this area has shifted to providing sup-port primarily for the enabling process owners with Breakthrough Productivity Improvement (BPI) goals. Prioritizing opportunities established through the BPI effort created the strategic alliance needed to integrate core and enabling processes. In an effort to drive the redesign necessary for substantial cost savings and service improvements, process owners are utilizing process management tools, including benchmarking, standardization and data analysis methodologies. Many of the enabling process owners are recognizing the benefits of data-driven decision-making and the value of developing a process approach to problem-solving and project-management. The integration of cross-functional efforts has been a key driver for many of the improvement/standardization efforts. 5. Diversity a. General The Postal Service is facing internal and external business needs that provide both chal-lenge and opportunity for improved financial performance. Internally, we must continue to create an inclusive environment, build upon our diverse talents and drive out discrimination and sexual harassment. External factors include: retaining talented employees, meeting legal and regulatory equal employment opportunity man-dates, enhancing our corporate image as a responsible corporate citizen of the diverse com-munities we serve and promoting business and community partnerships. To meet these challenges, Diversity Development is focused on four principal objec-tives: (1) workplace environment, (2) workplace management, (3) leadership development and (4) customer and community relations. During the upcoming year, Diversity Development will continue its efforts to help make the Postal Service a great place to work. This means striving for a place where everyone's participation is wel-come and no one is subjected to discrimination or sexual harassment. It is also a place where employees have access to programs that help them advance as far as their talents and desires will take them. Diversity Development is providing the training and messaging to build an inclusive and harassment-free workplace. This includes special emphasis programs that encourage our employees to appreciate each other's differences and to exclude no one from organizational life because of those differences. We are making sure that both personnel selection and development partic-ipation are inclusive. We are taking steps to maximize the return on our investment in spon-sorships in multicultural communities. In addition, the Diversity Development vice presi-dent is actively involved with ensuring that the succession planning process is inclusive by partic-ipating with the Postmaster General and officers in their respective succession planning meetings. We will continue our efforts to help build a diverse supplier base by welcoming participation of small, minority- and women-owned busi-nesses. Realizing that suppliers also are our customers, our key objectives are to generate rev-enue from these sources and to increase customer service and satisfaction. b. National Diversity Recognition Program The Postal Service National Awards Program for Diversity Achievement recognizes individuals and teams that demonstrate exemplary efforts to encourage and promote diversity within the organization. Nominations are submitted for those 7•employees who focus on the Postal Service CustomerPerfect! goals which consist of the Voice of the Customer (VOC) , Voice of the Employee (VOE) and Voice of the Business (VOB). In 2000, there were approximately 1,600 nominations, of which 452 were screened by a team of six postal executives. The categories for award consideration were Individual, Partnership, Team, Leadership and the Dot Sharpe Lifetime Achievement Award. In addi-tion to these awards, a Vice President category was established to recognize several employees, both individually and collectively, who specifi-cally helped to advance the vision of diversity within the Postal Service. Recognizing and valuing diversity continues to be a business requirement and is key to attaining CustomerPerfect! goals. Recognizing postal em-ployees for their support of and accountability to diversity initiatives will continue to assist the Postal Service in remaining an inclusive organization. c. Employment of Individuals with Disabilities The Postal Service uses regular competitive procedures in selecting individuals with disabilities for employment. Individuals with severe disabilities receive non-competitive employment consideration through referrals from individual state departments of vocational rehabilitation or the U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs. In 2000, the Postal Service's career workforce included 49,155 employees with reported disabilities. Of these, over 7,000 were employees with targeted disabilities. Each year, the Postal Service submits an Affirmative Employment Plan and an Accomplish-ment Report for Individuals with Disabilities to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The Affirmative Employment Plan is disseminated to Postal Service field installations. Each installation head is responsible for implementing the plans. d. Veterans' Employment The Postal Service is one of the largest em-ployers of veterans and disabled veterans in the nation. At the end of 2000, the Postal Service employed about 244,000 veterans of whom about 80,000 are disabled because of injuries received in the uniformed services. The Postal Service prepares an annual Accomplishment Report and Plan Certification for disabled veterans for submission to the Office of Personnel Management. e. Affirmative Employment Programs The Affirmative Employment Program (AEP) unit provides national guidance on the Postal Service's affirmative action and employment program. During 2000, the following actions were taken to improve the inclusiveness and retention of the postal workforce: Published and distributed the Affirmative Employment Plan and Accomplishment Report for individuals with disabilities to management and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Published and distributed to management the Affirmative Employment Plan and Accomplishment Report for disabled vet-erans to management and the Office of Personnel Management. Implemented the Diversity Quarterly Tracking Report to monitor affirmative employment activities nationwide. Completed AEP Accomplishment Reports that addressed the prevention of sexual harassment, employee group representation, discrimination complaints, recruitment and hiring, employee development, promotions, separations, retention, program evaluation, veterans and people with disabilities. In accordance with Section 717 of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, the EEOC requires the submission of the Affirmative Employment Plan Accomplishment Reports, with updates for multi-year plans each fiscal year. The Diversity Reporting System (DVRS) provides detailed workforce statistical reports used to analyze postal workforce data and identify employment trends. Statistical information from DVRS is provided on request to the General Accounting Office, the EEOC, Congress and other external and internal customers. The Postal Service also administers the National Hispanic Program (NHP), Women's Program and Special Emphasis Programs. These programs focus attention on the special needs, obstacles and concerns of all groups when they are under-represented in postal employment. Major accomplishments for these programs are outlined as follows: 1. The National Hispanic Program (NHP) During 2000, the NHP Executive/Managerial Development Process, through its field network, continued its mission to address the VOE and underrepresentation of Hispanics in the Postal Service. 8 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 8•Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 9 Also during 2000, the NHP sponsored or attended recruitment and community outreach activities. One such activity was the Test Battery 460/470 Pre-Test Orientation. The number of qualified Hispanics applying for and obtaining Postal Service jobs at all levels has increased because of this activity. Hispanic Program special-ists have participated in recruitment drives, Test Battery 460/470 preparedness seminars, Form 991 preparation and Advanced Leadership Program recruitment. In its efforts to respond to the Voices of the Customer and Business goals, the NHP sponsored numerous national events involving the National Council of La Raza, the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Hispanic Data - the electronic job posting website, the Hispanic Employees Program Management, the Hispanic National Bar Association, the National Organization for Mexican American Rights, the National Hispanic Leadership Institute, the Transporte Integrado y Masivo Hispanic Yearbook, the League of United Latin American Citizens and the Hispanic Business Expo of Central Florida. These outreach activities have helped to establish the Postal Service as a benchmark among our nation's businesses in addressing the needs of the Hispanic community. 2. The Women's Program During 2000, the Postal Service continued its commitment to improving the status of women in the workforce. Through structured programs and positive actions these efforts have assisted with the removal of barriers and the inclusion of women at every level in the organization. Some of the major accomplishments designed to address the Voice of the Employee and the underrepresentation of women in the Postal Service were: Redesign and update of the Women's Program website. provided information on recruitment, career development and hyper-links to national women's organizations. Establishment and implementation of a Diversity Executive Advisory Committee to identify and resolve Special Emphasis Programs issues. Sponsorship of the National Association for Female Executives, the Business Women's Network Diversity Council and Leaders' Summit, Business and Professional Women and Federally Employed Women. These out-reach activities have furthered the Postal Service's recruitment, career development and supplier diversity efforts. Based on statistics from Quarter 4, 1999 to Quarter 4, FY 2000, and the Quarterly Workforce Profile, the nationwide representation of female employees increased in each level grouping except for PCES-02: The National Women's Program plans to continue its awareness campaign using postal media, and websites of women's organizations. The program is designed to assist women with career development and to facilitate networking and support. It provides sponsorship to the Advanced Leadership Program and executive edu-cation programs at various universities. The Women's Program will continue to ana-lyze studies that focus on work and family life and address issues such as recruitment, retention, men-toring and succession planning. 3. Special Emphasis Program During 2000, the Special Emphasis Program focused on recruitment, retention promotional opportunities for African Americans, American Indians, Native Alaskans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, people with disabilities, veterans and white males. White females and Hispanics are addressed by the Women's Program and the National Hispanic Program, respectively. Some of the major accomplishments of the Special Emphasis Program were: Compliance with the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Compliance with the President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities. The Special Emphasis Program created a joint video on disability awareness and asso-ciated service talks to increase appreciation of the Postal Service's commitment to employees and customers with disabilities. Creation of Diversity Development's Special Emphasis Web page on the corporate intranet that strategically addresses topics on recruitment, presidential proclamations, pub-lications and links to external organizations. Sponsorship of external national special emphasis organizations with the goal of increasing awareness about availability of postal products, supplier services and career opportunities. EAS 01-14 0.1% Increase EAS 15-18 0.6% Increase EAS 19 and above 1.0% Increase PCES-01 2.9% Increase PCES-02 0.9% Decrease 9•10 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies f. National Sexual Harassment Prevention This year Publication 553, Employees' Guide to Understanding Sexual Harassment, was mailed to the home of every postal employee. The guide will help employees understand sexual harassment and how to resolve related complaints. All postal employees were required to take sexual harassment prevention training in 2000 as part of their VOE requirements. EAS employees received 2 hours of training, which included the Initial Management Inquiry Process. Craft employees received one hour of training. Each Area was provided with training films. The sexual harass-ment course series for EAS employees was broadcast monthly on the Postal Service Television Network (PSTN) and the Initial Management Inquiry Process (IMIP) was broadcast quarterly. The IMIP helped managers and supervisors effec-tively identify, investigate, prevent and resolve sexual harassment situations in the workplace. This program included a one-hour segment designed to increase awareness among craft employees of the serious nature of sexual harassment. g. Supplier Diversity The Postal Service's Supplier Diversity pro-gram is a fundamental element in the Postal Service's corporate strategy to remain competitive and profitable in the marketplace. Our record is a good one and because our business and financial challenges are more similar to those of the private sector than those of government agencies, the Postal Service has adopted more of a private-sector approach to supplier diversity. That approach is based on strengthening our supplier base by reaching out to identify strong suppliers and pro-viding them with opportunities to compete for our contracts. When we benchmark our results against either the public or the private sectors, we find ourselves clearly among the leaders engaging small and woman-owned businesses and above average with regard to minority businesses. The Postal Service provides a wide range of programs and efforts aimed at promoting the involvement of small, minority and woman-owned businesses in our purchase opportunities. Close and effective working relationships are maintained with a number of the national associations and their affiliates that support supplier development and diversity throughout the country. These include, among others, the National Council of La Raza, the National Urban League, the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the Organization of Chinese Americans, the Women Business Enterprise National Council, the National Association of Women Business Owners, the Business Women's Network, the U.S. Pan Asian American Chamber of Commerce, the National Congress of American Indians the National Minority Supplier Development Council. The Postal Service actively supports these organiza-tions and participates in workshops sponsored by them, as we do in those sponsored by members of Congress and state and local governments; the Postal Service participated in an estimated 100 trade, federal, congressional and special-emphasis supplier-focused events across the country. Further communication is maintained through a Postal Service web page that addresses the small, minority- and woman-owned business communi-ties and provides information on purchase opportunities as they arise, contact points, policies and procedures. During 2000, the Postal Service focused on tracking and measuring key elements of the Five-Year Supplier Diversity Plan issued in 1999. Efforts centered on three of the Plan's six key areas: accountability, sourcing and training. In April, guidelines were issued for setting performance goals for buying organizations and individual buyers. Effort-based indicators were outlined that meet both the Postal Service's sup-plier diversity policies and legal requirements applicable to the Postal Service. These indicators include attending and participating in trade fairs and events promoting small, minority- and woman-owned businesses; ensuring that these entrepreneurs are included in the sourcing process; debriefing small, minority- and woman-owned businesses that have unsuccessfully competed for a contract; tracking use of certified supplier databases or other methods of identifying qualified suppliers; and counting the number of purchase opportuni-ties offered. As noted, sourcing, which is the process of locating suppliers, is receiving particular emphasis. The Postal Service continues to work to improve and systematize our ability to identify and do busi-ness with those suppliers that provide best value, perform reliably, work with the Postal Service to reduce cost and cycle time, and strive to reduce risk while improving quality. As part of this effort, during 2000 the Postal Service sponsored a Southern California Pilot Program to develop new approaches to promoting supplier diversity. Major accomplishments from this effort include the development of a standardized communications 10•Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 11 packet for suppliers, stronger approaches to estab-lishing partnerships with trade and industry associations and state/local government agencies, as well as the creation of a consolidated sourcing database for Southern California (Long Beach, Los Angeles, San Diego, Santa Ana and Van Nuys). These achievements are now being examined with an eye toward replicating them nationwide. Lastly, as a part of ongoing supply chain management efforts, the Postal Service continued to work with its prime suppliers and industry resources to iden-tify and develop a listing of "proven" minority-and woman-owned businesses. The listing is used for direct and subcontracting opportunities. Training continues to be critical to the overall success of the Supplier Diversity Program. Mandatory training requirements are in place for all employees in Postal Service buying functions to participate in 2-4 hours of cultural and supplier diversity training. In addition to this ongoing training, a number of customized training sessions for our Supplier Diversity Program representatives and contracting professionals were provided during 2000. A computer-based training (CBT) course is being developed for use throughout the Postal Service. We also have clarified and strengthened our subcontracting policies. This has led to marked improvement in this important area. Suppliers competing for high-dollar value contracts are now required to tell us, before award, how they plan to subcontract with small, minority- and woman-owned businesses. In addition, new tools to promote and monitor subcontracting with these businesses have been launched. These efforts have had significant results. By the end of 2000, 310 suppliers were submitting quarterly subcontracting reports as compared with 184 at the end of 1999. A total of 23,615 subcontracts worth more than $244.2 million went to minority businesses, while some 14,202 subcontracts worth $220.6 million went to woman-owned businesses. We consider these new policies a success, with more subcon-tracts being reported, more prime contractors submitting reports and higher overall dollars reportedly being spent in the small, minority- and woman-owned business communities. Outside of the subcontracting area, during 2000 more than $3.5 billion (representing 69.4 percent of contractual actions) went to small businesses. More than $336 million (representing 8.9 percent of contractual actions) went to minority businesses. More than $488 million (representing 11 percent of contractual actions) went to woman-owned businesses. Lastly, more than $16 million worth of contracts or orders went to Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act institutions, such as the National Industries for the Blind and Severely Handicapped. B. Service to Small or Rural Communities (39 U.S.C. 101(b)) Effective March 16, 1998, the United States Postal Service imposed a moratorium on manage-ment initiated Post Office closings and consolidations. With this moratorium, Post Offices will not be closed unless no other reasonable choice is available. Some closings (and suspen-sions) may be necessary or appropriate if postmasters retire suddenly or catastrophic events such as flood, fire or earthquake occur. The Postal Service invited the National Association of Postmasters of the United States and the National League of Postmasters of the United States to work with us. Their representatives and the Postal Service continue to review all recent and proposed Post Office closings and emergency sus-pensions to help determine appropriate courses of action. During 2000, the Postal Service closed or consolidated 18 Post Offices, 16 community Post Offices and 3 classified stations. These Post Offices were in the process of being closed before the issuance of the moratorium and thus were allowed to continue through the closing process. Only one appeal was docketed with the Postal Rate Commission. It concerned an office that had been closed two years previously and was remanded to the Postal Service for further consideration. C. Employee Compensation and Career Advancement (39 U.S.C. 101 (c)) 1. Collective Bargaining The Postal Service began separate negotia-tions in August 2000 with the American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (APWU) and the National Postal Mail Handlers Union, AFL-CIO (NPMHU); and in September 2000 with the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association (NRLCA) for successor collective bargaining agree- 11•ments to those set to expire on November 20, 2000. All three unions together represent approxi-mately 514,000 employees. The negotiations with the NRLCA follows an agreement between the parties reached in February 2000 on a one year extension to the 1995-1999 Postal Service-NRLCA National Agreement. Negotiations with postal unions cover a full range of topics involving wages, benefits and conditions of employment. Collective bargaining with the National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO (NALC), which represents approximately 245,000 employees, over the successor to the three-year 1998 National Agreement, will occur in 2001. In April 2000, the terms of the collective bargaining agreement covering approximately 1,100 employees at the Information Service Centers were established by an interest arbi-tration award. The Award provides for a two-year agreement that will expire on January 20, 2001. The Postal Service and the Fraternal Order of Police reached agreement on the terms of a new four-year labor contract in July 2000. The previous labor agreement had expired in April 1999, and the parties had agreed to meet in a final effort to seek agree-ment in advance of scheduled fact-finding. The settlement, which will expire in April 2003, covers approximately 1,250 Postal Police officers. The collective bargaining agreement between the Postal Service and the National Postal Professional Nurses expired on February 11, 2000. The parties failed to reach agreement on a successor contract. The dispute will be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution procedures of the Postal Reorganization Act with an outcome expected in 2001. Agreements between the Postal Service and certain smaller bargaining units will also be expiring - for example, Operating Services APWU on November 20, 2000, the Mail Equipment Shops - Tool and Die (International Association of Machinists) on January 30, 2001. As an outgrowth of the APWU collective bargaining agreement, the parties have made significant strides toward improving the workplace environment by clarifying the terms of the labor agreement and its applica-tion. The APWU and the Postal Service have agreed to revise the grievance procedure in order to streamline the grievance process and reduce the backlog of national cases. Future refinements to the grievance process will be addressed during 2000 negotiations. The Postal Service and the NPMHU have completed the first year of their test of a revised grievance-arbitration procedure. The test procedure, which eliminates the third step of the grievance process, has produced a greater resolution of grievances at the local facility. Future efforts will include a review of the process with local labor and manage-ment representatives with emphasis on those locations where the test procedure has been less effective. The parties continue to develop the Contract Interpretation Manual (CIM), with the ini-tial draft completed early this year. The parties are now jointly reviewing each section for refinement and completion of supporting references where appropriate. The Postal Service and the NPMHU hosted their third annual Quality of Work Life Conference. This national event, attended by both craft employees and managers from participating facilities, continues to showcase the various processes developed to improve the workplace environment and Postal Service operations. After successfully testing the revised Dispute Resolution Process (DRP) for two years in 19 test districts, the Postal Service and the NALC agreed in August of 2000 to imple-ment the process nationwide beginning in 2001. The parties further agreed to rewrite Article 15 of the National Agreement to reflect the new process during 2001 national negotiations. Data from the test sites reflected an increase in resolution rates at the local level and a decrease in disputes appealed to arbitration. The DRP elimi-nates the current area Step 3 review and places the authority and responsibility for the resolution of grievances at the installa-tion and district levels. It provides for the training and certification of the district level Step B representatives, one each from the NALC and the Postal Service. The imple-mentation of the new process will include this training as well as district orientation for city letter carriers and delivery supervi-sors. The district-by-district implementation of the DRP began with a training session for the candidates nominated to serve as the 12 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 12•district level Step B representatives in October of 2000. In June of 1998, the USPS-NALC pro-duced the Postal Service-NALC Joint Contract Administration Manual (JCAM). This contract resource became widely used in the field to facilitate the resolution of workplace disputes, promoting a better understanding of the proper application of and compliance with the National Agree-ment. It has been credited by both the Postal Service and the NALC with signifi-cant reductions in appeals to arbitration. In September of 2000, the Postal Service and NALC published an updated edition of the JCAM which was distributed to every city delivery unit in the system. In the area of Labor Relations Systems, a redesign of the Grievance and Arbitration Tracking System (GATS) was initiated. All field offices are now required to input griev-ances at the Step 2 level of the process for inclusion in GATS. The new system, which is Y2K compliant, is user-friendly and will assist management in identifying and ana-lyzing disputes in the workplace. In addition, GATS2 will facilitate changes in the griev-ance/ arbitration scheduling process agreed to during 1998 negotiations. 2. Personnel a. Postal Career Executive Service (PCES) There were 970 individuals in the ranks of the PCES at the close of 2000. Of this total, 813 individuals held PCES I positions. The remainder (other than officers) served in Executive and Administrative (EAS) positions. There were 46 PCES II officer positions in the Postal Service at the end of the fiscal year. The makeup of the PCES officers and executives is representative of the Postal Service's diverse workforce. b. Consultation with Management Associations In accordance with Title 39, United States Code, Section 1004, consultations were con-ducted in 2000 with the National Association of Postal Supervisors (NAPS), the National Association of Postmasters of the United States (NAPUS) and the National League of Postmasters of the United States (League). These sessions provided an opportunity for the man-agement associations to participate directly in the planning and development of programs and policies related to pay policies that impact some 80,000 EAS postmasters, supervisors and other managerial personnel through 2000. Pay consul-tations will commence sometime in late spring or early summer 2001, with our continued emphasis on pay for performance through the Merit Pay Program and the EVA Variable Pay Program. The principle of market-based pay will be a fundamental concept underlying these con-sultations, ensuring that supervisory and managerial pay in the Postal Service is compa-rable to that maintained in the private sector of the economy as required by the Postal Reorganization Act. As in the past, each of the management asso-ciations will continue to provide representatives to participate on Headquarters and fieldwork teams tasked with formulating the testing procedures for new programs. During 2000, the labor unions, management associations and postal management held quar-terly (or as needed) labor summits, to discuss issues relevant to the parties. Under the auspices of the Labor Summit the management associa-tions and the Postal Service agreed upon a mediation pilot as an elective step in the current supervisory disciplinary appeals process (650 Process) and in most other adverse action pro-ceedings. Once the pilot is completed, it will be considered for nationwide implementation. Also in 2000, the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) restructured throughout the Postal Service. This restructuring effort allows us to focus the attention of EEO pro-fessionals at the district level on dispute resolution, while the responsibility for investigating complaints that cannot be resolved informally is moved to the Area level. The number of appeals centers respon-sible for the EEO process doubled in 2000, and the Resolve Employment Disputes, Reach Equitable Solutions Swiftly (REDRESS) mediation program was integrated into the EEO function. This inte-gration and restructuring was achieved without any planned increase in complement and eliminated the need for the temporary staff formerly required to support the REDRESS program. For the second consecutive year, the number of EEO precomplaint counselings and formal complaints in the Postal Service decreased. Pre-complaints decreased by 5.1 percent, from 26,460 to 25,086, while formal complaints fell 13.8 percent, from 12,137 to 10,457. Overall, the rate of precomplaint counselings that result in Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 13 13•formal complaints has been reduced from 46 per-cent in 1999 to 42 percent in 2000. This equates to 1,680 fewer formal complaints in 2000. This substantial, continued reduction in formal complaints is attributable in large measure to the Postal Service's EEO mediation program, REDRESS. REDRESSand traditional EEO coun-seling are both offered as alternatives to individuals seeking precomplaint counseling. The mediators in REDRESS are non-postal employees who are neutral and practice a form of mediation that is built on the "transformative" model. Through empowerment and recognition, the par-ties to the mediation are encouraged to listen and respond to one another's views effectively and with better understanding of their differences. In 1999, the participation rate in REDRESS for those seeking precomplaint counseling was nearly 70 percent. In 2000, the participation rate rose to 73 percent nationally. Successful resolution of disputes that go through mediation is nearly twice the rate of resolution of disputes that remain in the traditional counseling process. The continuing success of this process is encouraging. It will continue to be emphasized as a means of bringing employees and managers face to face to learn to deal with conflict and misunderstanding in the workplace. REDRESS II brings mediation to the formal complaint process through the hearing stage. In 2000. A program was implemented across the country through cooperation with the Office of the General Counsel. Expectations for the success of this program remain high. d. Injury Compensation In 2000, the Postal Service had an increase in the growth of workers' compensation cash outlays of approximately $65 million (11.4 percent) over 1999, for a total cash payout of approximately $633.3 million. Total paid compensation claims increased by 2,003 (7.1 percent) total medical claims increased by 7,172 (6 percent). During 2000, the Postal Service cost control strategy was again directed through the continued efforts to manage disability cases. A number of ini-tiatives support this objective. These include Nurse Case Manager services that assist the injury com-pensation staff with medical management strategies to help employees with work-related injuries or illnesses move into productive duty in a safe and positive environment. Specialists also use enhancements to the case management tools to track and analyze workers' compensation costs and return-to-work efforts. A new training course was developed with electronic publishing capabilities. The training course will produce human resources specialists with the knowledge and skills required to effec-tively provide medical and case management of worker's compensation issues. The Postal Inspection Service continued its efforts in 2000 to investigate fraud associated with postal employees' injury compensation claims. Postal inspectors identified 329 individuals sus-pected of workers' compensation violations. Criminal investigations led to 47 arrests. Specific incidents uncovered by postal inspectors include fraudulent claims for Federal Employees' Comp-ensation Act (FECA) benefits and falsification of investigations involving conspiracy and fraud by treating physicians and other medical providers. Compensation cost avoidance on all cases investi-gated by the Postal Inspection Service was estimated as nearly $118 million. Additional cost reduction on cases where Continuation of Pay was avoided brings the total estimated cost avoidance to over $122 million. Workers' Compensation payments represent a growing, long-term cost lia-bility for the Postal Service. e. Succession Planning Succession planning is the deliberate and sys-tematic effort by the Postal Service to ensure leadership continuity and build talent from within the organization. The objectives are to identify individuals who can move into executive positions, to develop people for corporate needs and to foster diversity among the leadership ranks. Individuals are identified as potential successors based on their leadership skills, functional and management expertise and performance results. The Postal Service's Succession Planning has been designed to place the right people in the right jobs. After com-pleting the sixth full year of succession planning, 90 percent of executive vacancies were filled by identified successors, and 6 percent were filled by nonsuccessors. Four percent of executive vacancies were filled from outside hires. Forty-four percent of vacant executive positions in 2000 were filled by promotions of EAS employees to PCES. Fifty-two percent were filled from within the executive ranks. A strategic initiative, "EAS Leadership Development," is underway to address our need for employee retention and leadership develop-ment. It is a comprehensive, customized process to identify and develop leadership competencies and 14 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 14•behaviors to drive success throughout the organiza-tion. Our goal is to have a cadre of talented individuals ready to assume key management posi-tions as they become available. f. Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) The Postal Service joins other federal agencies in the CFC drive each fall. In 2000, postal employees nationwide pledged a total of nearly $39 million in payroll deductions to the charities of their choice. The average gift was $176. 3. Compensation and Benefits a. Pay Comparability 1. Bargaining Unit Employees' Pay and Benefits. During 2000, the average pay and benefits for career bargaining unit employees (excluding corporate-wide expenses) is $50,103 per work year. In an attempt to achieve compensation rates comparable to private industry, negotiations between the Postal Service and union representa-tives for the various bargaining units that have reached negotiated settlements continue to apply the principle of moderate restraint set forth in past interest arbitration awards. 2. Nonbargaining Unit Employees' Pay and Benefits. Pay for supervisors, postmasters and other nonbargaining staff employees generally meets or exceeds private sector levels. It also provides an ade-quate and reasonable differential between first-line supervisors and bargaining unit clerks and carriers. The continuation of the EVA Variable Pay Program for EAS employees aligns this pay prac-tice with PCES executives and corporate success measures as established under the CustomerPerfect! process. This pay package gives management the framework it needs to drive the necessary behav-ioral changes that make the Postal Service competitive in the marketplace. 3. Executive Pay and Benefits. Due to the limit imposed on Executive Schedule I salaries by the Postal Reorganization Act, pay and benefits for Postal Service officers and some key executives do not meet private sector comparability standards. During 2000, the average salary for Postal Service officers was $140,958. The average executive salary was $101,756. The Postal Service continued to focus on cor-porate objectives through the 2000 EVA Variable Pay Program, which recognizes the significant role that postal executives and EAS employees play in achieving corporate success. The EVA Variable Pay Program awards payouts for achieving break-through performance. Furthermore, by using the same performance measures for officers, executives and EAS employees, participants become stakeholders in the success of the Postal Service in achieving its CustomerPerfect! goals. Finally, to help focus on continuous improvements and long-term results, the 2000 payments consisted of a percentage of prior year's reserve account and current year earned credit. In 2000, award payouts averaged $2,900 for exempt nonbargaining EAS employees, $1,000 for non-exempt nonbargaining employees and $10,100 for executives. While the program was designed to recognize team performance, provisions were made to exclude individual employees who did not con-tribute to the performance of the organization. b. Leave Programs Postal Service employees are provided both sick and annual leave at the same rate as other fed-eral sector employees. However, postal employees have a higher annual leave carryover limit than their federal sector counterparts. Postal employees used an average of 10.1 days of sick leave per employee during 2000. Earned annual leave may be donated to other career or transitional Postal Service employees who have exhausted their own leave and have a serious health problem. Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, eligible employees may take up to 12 weeks off from work for covered conditions. Postal Service employees may use annual leave, sick leave, or leave without pay for covered conditions in accor-dance with applicable collective bargaining agreements and current leave policies. Postal Service career nonbargaining unit employees and some bargaining unit employees can participate in a leave exchange program through which a portion of annual leave that would otherwise be earned in the following leave year can be exchanged for cash. The Postal Service allows the use of 80 hours of accrued sick leave for dependent care under a policy available to all career employees. c. Health Insurance Health care contributions totaled $3.1 bil-lion, or 6.2 percent of the Postal Service's total pay and benefits during 2000. Under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, the Postal Service is required to fund the annuitants' share of the Federal Employee Health Benefit (FEHB) pre-Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 15 15•miums. During 2000, the cost of funding the health care benefits for postal annuitants and their survivors was $744 million. During 2000, the Postal Service continued to pay most of the premium cost of employee health benefit coverage. Career employees are automatically enrolled to pay their share of health benefit premium contributions with pre-tax payroll deductions. d. Life Insurance The Federal Employees Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) program provides life insurance coverage for Postal Service employees. The Postal Service assumes the full cost of basic life insurance for eli-gible employees. During 2000, Postal Service costs for employee life insurance were $194 million and the cost of funding life insurance for postal annui-tants and their survivors was $6.7 million. In 1999, employees were offered the oppor-tunity to change life insurance coverage under the FEGLI Program. More than 90,000 employees made elections to acquire or modify their coverage during that open enrollment period. These elections and changes became gen-erally effective May 6, 2000. e. Retirement Systems Postal Service career employees, like federal career employees, are covered by one of three retirement systems administered by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. At the end of 2000, there were 785,913 career employees covered by a federal retirement program. Of this total, 519,509 employees (65 percent) were covered by the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS); 263,383 employees (33.5 percent) were covered by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS); 12,021 employees (1.5 percent) were covered by CSRS Offset. CSRS is a defined benefit retirement system. Annuity benefits are based on an employee's high-three average salary and years of service. CSRS Offset is similar to CSRS but requires Social Security contributions. Upon Social Security eligibility, the CSRS annuity is reduced (offset) by any Social Security benefit resulting from periods of CSRS Offset service, to produce a benefit equivalent to what would have been received under CSRS. FERS is a retirement system with both defined benefit and defined contribution compo-nents. Under FERS, employees receive retirement benefits from a federal retirement annuity, Social Security and the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). The FERS annuity benefit, while also based on an employee's high-three average salary and years of service, produces a smaller benefit than CSRS does. The Postal Service and career employees make retirement contributions to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund. For 2000, CSRS employees contributed 7.25 percent of basic pay to the Fund. FERS and CSRS Offset employees con-tributed 1.05 percent of basic pay to the Fund and 6.2 percent of gross pay to Social Security. f. Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) All career employees may participate in the TSP, which is administered by the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. The rules for TSP participation differ depending on the employee's retirement system. For FERS employees, the Postal Service contributes one percent of basic pay to TSP, fully matches employee contributions up to 3 percent of basic pay, and matches one-half of employee contributions from 3 to 5 percent of basic pay. FERS employees may contribute up to 10 per-cent of basic pay to TSP on a tax-deferred basis, subject to IRS maximum limits. The Postal Service does not match CSRS or CSRS Offset employee contributions to the TSP. Employees' contributions are limited to 5 percent of basic pay. At the end of 2000, 411,825 FERS employees and 155,137 CSRS and CSRS Offset employees participated in TSP. g. Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) Employees continue to take advantage of FSAs to pay for certain health care and dependent care expenses with contributions made through pretax payroll deductions. FSAs were first offered in 1992 to certain nonbargaining unit employees and have since been expanded to include all employees. In 2000, 53,083 employees were enrolled in health care FSAs (an 8.5 percent increase from 1999), with an average contribution of $1,318. In 2000, 5,957 employees were enrolled in dependent care FSAs (a 1.5 percent increase from 1999), with an average contribution of $2,770. The projected 2000 savings for the Postal Service resulting from the FSA program is approximately $2.4 million (net of administrative expenses). Employees experience tax savings as well, which vary according to the individual's con-tribution amounts and marginal tax rates. 16 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 16•Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 17 4. Employee Development a. General Employee Development has two main areas of responsibility: Product Development and Evaluation, which designs, develops and evaluates curricula and; and Delivery, which operates at the William F. Bolger Center for Leadership Development, Potomac, Maryland and at the National Center for Employee Development (NCED), Norman, Oklahoma. Both centers are self-contained campuses with classrooms, confer-ence facilities, housing, dining and related services. There are 85 Postal Employee Development Centers (PEDCs) throughout the nation that support operational needs by pro-viding local training assistance to employees. While traditional classrooms, on-the-job instruction and correspondence courses are still prevalent, delivery platforms increasingly include satellit networks, videotape, computer-based inter-active programs, web-based instruction and combinations of the above. With the continuation of the Associate Supervisor Program (ASP), Career Management Program (CMP) and Advanced Leadership Program (ALP), the training and development needs of supervisors and managers at all levels of the organization are being met. The 16-week ASP for first-line supervisors continues to be a national success. All 85 Districts participate in the program. The program has trained 8,164 graduates. In 2000, 129 classes were conducted. The CMP was introduced in the spring of 1999. CMP addresses the needs of supervisors and managers in the EAS level 15-22 range. In 2000, over 50 offerings were completed for 1,500 EAS employees. There are three entry points or tracks representing initial and advanced supervi-sory skills and management development. Participants complete an assessment based on the leadership competency model to determine their appropriate entry point into the program. Currently the program consists of one week of classroom instruction for each track. In addition, functional/technical training is available for delivery and mail processing supervisors. Several other functions have functional/technical curricula already in place for supervisors The ALP continued to make significant progress in preparing high-potential managers for the challenging leadership roles of the future. By the end of the year, a total of 34 classes with approximately 42 students per class had entered the program. Several program design improve-ments were made. Among them were a new ALP video describing the Executive Competency model; an updated enrollment guide and web site; a new evening speaker series called Executive Chat; and, the addition of two Postal Vice Presidents as regularly appearing ALP faculty. Most notably, ALP was reviewed by the American Council on Education and was rated as carrying 12 undergraduate college credits. As a result, ALP students pursuing college degrees will now be able to apply their ALP experience toward their college degree requirements. PBS-The Business Channel continued as an initiative in 2000. The innovative partnership offered postal employees quality training programs via the Postal Satellite Training Network (PSTN). Training programs were available live five days a week, with taping available on all telecasts. This timely, professional and cost-effective training alternative proved to be an effective way to convey corporate messages. For example, 86,000 employees received sexual harassment training through this medium in 2000. The Safety for Leadership course, designed to help more than 35,000 postal leaders under-stand and implement safety programs in the Postal Service, rolled out at the National Center for Employee Development this year. This course has become an integral part of ASP and lays a foundation for the Joint Labor Management Safety and Health Committee, Collateral Duty Facility Safety Coordinator and other safety pro-grams. Courses were upgraded and refreshed to meet requirements of the Postal Employee Safety Enhancement Act (PESEA). b. Technical and Craft Training The NCED, Norman, OK, advanced its crit-ical support of the Postal Service's core business and employee development. NCED delivered automa-tion and motor vehicle maintenance and operations courses on major postal systems and equipment, plus environmental compliance and automation management programs. Other initiatives supported field office course requests, equipment changes and deployment of national postal goals. Staff conducted 220 courses, in 3,400 class offerings, for 61,000 employees. Strict budget con-trols and revenue achievements delivered this 15 percent increase in students at slightly below last year's total program and administrative costs. 17•Efforts continued to expand NCED's curriculum to support a broader base of postal clients, includ-ing several new management courses and to enhance administrative and operating proficiency. The Center also launched efforts to attract non-postal clients to generate more of its own operating revenue and reduce its dependence on postal headquarters funding. Staff began creating learning tools to develop maintenance employees' basic technical skills and provide continuous learning while in their home offices. Planned introductory courses will better prepare postal employees for high-tech, equip-ment- specific courses at NCED. Additionally, staff built an electronic technical skills database to provide maintenance managers and employees with a skill development tracking reference. A major undertaking brought a new Web-based Automated Enrollment System (AES) on line in 2000. The new Web-AES is user-friendly, acces-sible and will increase report and tracking opportunities. The new AES collected field requests for 2001 programs and distributed available course seats to district and maintenance offices. It was also designed to collect fee data in anticipation of NCED's new revenue-based operation. NCED transmitted over 4,200 hours of Postal Satellite Training Network (PSTN) pro-gramming in 2000. NCED originated over 1,900 broadcast hours of course and technical informa-tion, and it transmitted another 2,300 broadcast hours originated elsewhere, including the Business and Management Channel, the Bolger Center and USPS-TV Southeast Area District programs. Using both PSTN and Postal Audio Tele-training Network (PATN), NCED delivered 30 distance learning courses to 17,450 employees in their home offices, for 195,040 total distance learning training hours. 1. Major NCED Accomplishments Taught five simultaneous course offerings on the Identification Code Sortation (ICS) system to provide maintenance skills for over 800 technicians. ICS uses existing identifica-tion mail tags as a second source for bar coding to help keep mail pieces in the auto-mated mail stream. Ongoing courses will support national deployment of over 1,700 new ICS computers. Completed deployment support for the Flat Mail Optical Character Reader (FMOCR) by running three tours of course offerings. Continued two-tour offerings for ongoing FMOCR support. The FMOCR addition to the FSM 881 has resulted in significant labor saving and increased mail throughput. Provided 12 course offerings on the new Time and Attendance Collection System (TACS). Modified Delivery Bar Code Sorter (DBCS) programs to support new deployment of the new DBCS Delivery Input and Output Subsystem (DIOSS) varied equipment con-figurations at 380 DBCS sites. Merged Remote Computer Reader modifica-tions into maintenance courses. RCR modifications are expected to increase the machine acceptance rate for handwritten mail from 63 to 75 percent by December 2000. Provided technical support to contractor-delivered resident and PSTN maintenance courses for 350 employees on the Phase I buy of 175 AFSM 100. We also began instructor and lab preparations for NCED to deliver maintenance courses beginning March 2001, concurrent with contractor offerings. AFSM 100s can process 17,000 pieces of flat mail per hour. AFSM 100 Phase II will deploy another 362 machines requiring maintenance course support. Each Phase II machine will replace two to three existing Flat Sorting Machine 881 systems. Delivered operator and maintenance courses on the new (PBSM) 624Bs, upgraded to read the new $5, $10 and $20 bills. Courses support the nationwide deployment of 1,000 PBSM 625Bs. Piloted a new Maintenance Operations Performance Analysis course. Taught use of maintenance and inventory management reports from the Visual Maintenance Activity Reporting and Scheduling system to analyze performance factors and improve efficiency. Prepared automotive technician course on new Carrier Route Flex Fuel delivery vehicles to support planned deployment of 10,600 vehicles. Offerings will begin October 2000. Conducted about 30 environmental health and safety programs on postal compliance with national rules and regulations. Courses included hazard communications, waste reduction and recycling, refrigerant educa-tion and certification, asbestos management and toxic substance control. Designed classroom labs and supported the newly centralized Business Mail Acceptance (BMA) program. This course brought a new 18 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 18•postal audience to the Center, coaching clerks in skills to ensure proper revenue col-lection on volume business mail. By year end, the BMA program had ramped up to three simultaneous offerings, and 313 employees had taken the test. 2. Revenue Generation Center staff captured over $3.2 million in gross revenue in 2000 to help offset NCED operating expenses. Revenue sources include postal and nonpostal conferences, resale of satel-lite time, housing income from nonstudent guests and delivery of other postal and non-postal courses. Housing room nights during 2000 totaled 203,000 of which 22,800 were for conferees. c. William F. Bolger Center for Leadership Development The Bolger Center has made significant strides toward becoming self-reliant. In 2000, the Center piloted a revenue budget concept. Under this con-cept, the Center identifies its potential through projected sales goals generated through the services provided to postal and external customers. The amount of sales generated from external customers is tracked and deposited into the Postal Service General Fund account and the Center is credited for any profit gained. This process is still in the pilot stages. A number of improvements were made to The Bolger Center and its operations during the past year. These improvements include installation of a campus wide Energy Management System, refurbishment of the North Building West Wing classrooms and public space, and complete renova-tion of the 5th floor of the Main Building. A Postmark America store is scheduled to open at the Center in early January 2001. Customer satisfac-tion scores for the year were very high, at 98.9 percent overall satisfied. The Media Unit produced nearly 250 hours of PSTN programming, serving clients such as Sales, Employee Resource Management, Human Resources and Address Management Delivery Policies and Programs. The Media Unit also pro-duced over 20 videotape productions, earning Telly and Videographer Awards for production excellence for Computerized Job Bidding, Supervisor's Guide To Time & Attendance, and Training Inspectors For the 21st Century. Media also partnered with Tactical Marketing and Sales to provide monthly PSTN broadcasts that pro- vided training and information to field mar-keting and sales professionals. Our existing computer training lab was remodeled, and a new lab was completed that essentially doubles our computer training capacity. 5. Selection, Evaluation and Recognition a. Merit Pay Performance Evaluation In 2000, the Postal Service continued to emphasize the importance of the Merit Performance Evaluation process. This process evaluates and rewards the performance of professional and mana-gerial personnel. The process employs indices and measurements tied to the work unit's mission when establishing employee objectives for the year. These indices and measurements are used to assess the employee's success in meeting these mutually agreed-upon objectives. As with last years' program, the Merit Performance Evaluation process continues to be closely aligned with the CustomerPerfect! phi-losophy. It provides a mechanism to link employee contributions to corporate goals. In 2000 an individual Merit Performance Evaluation process covering executives was con-tinued. Its primary purpose is to promote individual accountability to support both corpo-rate goals and certain critical indicators that contribute to the success of the Postal Service. One critical indicator emphasizes diversity and requires executives to develop individual goals that pro-mote diversity, while taking into account the specific activities identified in their organizational affirmative action plan when setting specific targets for success. Like the performance evaluations for professional and managerial employees, the execu-tive evaluations also link contributions to the overall achievement of corporate goals. 6. Workplace Environment Improvement (WEI) The Office of WEI was created in September 1998 to reflect management's commitment to improving the postal work environment and bringing focus to "people issues" in the Postal Service. WEI includes the Employee Assistance Program, violence prevention and crisis manage-ment activities, the identification and propagation of indicators, measures and initiatives for work-place environment improvement. Key components of WEI for 2000 and 2001 are to: Coordinate implementation of recommenda-tions from report by the independent Commission on Safe and Secure Workplace. Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 19 19• Modify role of Employee Workplace Intervention Analyst position to play more strategic and consultative role in field WEI efforts to oversee threat assessment and crisis management activities. Integrate, assess and communicate employee feedback and other workplace environment information. Catalog, assess and support replication of a broad array of workplace improvement ini-tiatives and practices. Identify or develop and deploy measures of results and indicators of progress. Communicate throughout the Postal Service progress in improving workplace environ-ment recognize successes in this area. Specific areas in which these components are carried out are: a. Employee Assistance Program (EAP) The Postal Service EAP provides free, volun-tary, confidential, in-person counseling services to employees and family members by master's-level counselors housed in or near local postal facilities. Counselors are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, in convenient locations and assist employees and family members with a variety of difficulties that affect their lives and their work, including emotional, financial, legal, chemical dependency, marital and family problems. The EAP provides consultation to managers and supervisors regarding not only individual workers, but also the work setting within which they function. In 2000, Employee and Workplace Intervention Analysts, career employees who oversee the EAP in each District EAP counselors provided approximately 21,837 consultations to management on such topics as supervision strategies and manage-ment skills. They also worked with union members to help resolve issues and prevent workplace disrup-tion. The EAP intervenes when appropriate through preventive efforts, such as manager coaching and educational seminars on communication and stress management. EAP also provides ameliorative efforts that include conflict resolution sessions and organi-zational interventions and restorative actions, such as debriefings after a critical incident (e.g., suicide, domestic violence at work, armed robbery, acci-dental death). In 2000, 46,153 employees and their family members received counseling from the EAP. Fully 52 percent percent of postal employees seeking counseling reported that their problems negatively affected their job performance. EAP staff also responded to over 394 critical incidents and provided assistance to more than 6,392 employees after these incidents. Health and well-ness seminars on topics ranging from stress management to elder care to substance abuse were provided to 53,540 employees. b. Violence Prevention and Crisis Management A Workplace Environment Advisory Committee, including representatives of employee unions, management associations, labor relations and human resources was created shortly after the inception of this office in late 1998 with the Manager, WEI, as chair. This group, working closely with the Inspection Service and WEI, uses a standardized protocol for the identification and resolution of potential "troubled worksites," postal sites that may be susceptible to threatening or other undesirable behavior as a result of individual or systemic problems. In addition, WEI is assisting the field in ensuring that local threat assessment and crisis management teams are in place and that desired training is provided. Finally, WEI staff are involved, on an ongoing basis, in communication with and response to potential threats and crisis incidents throughout the Postal Service to ensure prompt response, swift resolution and maximum safety of postal employees. WEI played a key role in the dissemination of the report of the independent Commission on a Safe and Secure Workplace, also known as the Califano Commission, as it was chaired by Joseph A. Califano, Jr. The commission conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of violence in the Postal Service over a two-year period and released its findings in August 2000. The commission found that while postal employees are not more likely to be victims of vio-lence at work, they are more fearful than other employees about violence in the workplace. On the other hand, postal employees are less angry, aggres-sive, hostile, depressed and stressed than those in the national workplace. The commission recognized the Postal Service's strong efforts in developing a com-prehensive array of programs to reduce workplace violence, but made recommendations for the fol-lowing improvements: Continue and step up violence prevention programs already in place and address under-lying sources of friction. Screen job applicants more carefully. Define "zero tolerance" for violence policy. Continue violence awareness training for em-ployees, with unions playing a greater role. 20 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 20•Ensure warning signals of violence are heeded and employees know how to report threats and violence. Establish communication systems such as cell phones or beepers for carriers on delivery routes, especially in high crime and remote areas. Allay employee concerns about confiden-tiality of the EAP Encourage joint local union/management oversight. Train managers and union officials to better handle employee terminations. Increase training of supervisors and managers in interpersonal skills. Strengthen incentives to focus managers on the workplace environment, in addition to cus-tomer satisfaction and financial performance. Also, according to the Commission, Postal Service, unions and management associations should overhaul dispute resolution processes and agree on a system of financial performance incentives for craft employees. Finally, the Commission recommended that Congress should consider revamping compensation systems for postal managers and employees to eliminate or at least raise the pay ceiling to attract the best man-agers and effectively reward good performance of all postal workers. WEI is taking the lead in 2001 in ensuring that the recommendations are implemented where feasible and that employees are informed about progress in this area. c. Integration of Employee Feedback and Workplace Environment WEI is playing a pivotal role in increasing the effectiveness with which data from the VOE survey and other workplace environment informa-tion are used. The Board of Governors approved a compensable indicator using six survey questions for the 2000 survey. This index will be retained as a compensable indicator for 2001. WEI provides technical assistance to the field in interpreting and responding to these data also facilitates sharing of information about field and best practices that impact positively on the work environment. WEl staff serve as internal consultants on WEI efforts throughout the country, with an emphasis on increasing the efficiency and effec-tiveness of these activities, particularly with regard to the use of outside consultants. Also, WEI is propagating information throughout the Postal Service regarding internal and external resources for addressing workplace environment issues, including local and national Postal Service initia-tives and outside sources which have been shown to improve workplace relationships and climate. Finally, WEI will continue to deliver national messaging in 2001, to ensure that the business case for improving the workplace is recognized and accepted. d. Dependent Care Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding negotiated with APWU, AFL-CIO for the 1998-2000 National Agreement, the Postal Service and the APWU have jointly selected a vendor to provide a dependent care resource and referral service to management and APWU employees. The service allows employees to get assistance in locating dependent and elder care resources as well as a variety of options to help balance work and home life. D. Postal Cost Apportionment and Filings and Ratemaking, Developments (39 U.S.C. 101 (d)) 1. Omnibus Rate Case - Docket No. R2000-1 On January 12, 2000, the Postal Service filed a Request for a Postal Rate Commission Recommended Decision on changes in rates and fees. The proposed overall percentage change was 6.5 percent and included a 1-cent (or 3 percent) increase from the current 33-cent basic First-Class rate. The proposed increase was designed to pro-vide an additional $3.7 billion in revenue. The filing also included numerous classifica-tion changes that were responsive to customer needs and the changing environment. For example, new work sharing discounts were proposed for Bound Printed Matter and more affordable options for reply mail and the return of merchandise were developed. Also, a restructuring of Post Office box fees was proposed so that the fees would better reflect the local costs of providing the service. Approximately 10 months after the filing of the request following hearings on the Postal Service's direct case and intervenors' direct cases rebuttal testimony, the Postal Rate Commission issued its Recommended Decision on November 13, 2000. While the Postal Rate Commission rec-ommended most of the classification changes Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 21 21•proposed by the Postal Service, along with the 1-cent increase in the first ounce of the First-Class rate, it substantially reduced the Postal Service's estimate of required revenue, as developed on the evidentiary record. As a consequence, the PRC sub-stantially reduced many of the other rate increases proposed by the Postal Service. The end result was, according to the Commission's calculations, a 4.6 percent increase, compared with the 6.5 percent increase proposed by the Postal Service. The Postal Service's Governors issued two Decisions on December 5. In the primary Decision, the Governors allowed the recommended rates to take effect under protest, but returned the matter to the Commission for reconsideration. In particular, the Governors asked the Commission to reconsider several items related to the revenue requirement (which governs the overall size of the rate increase), along with several other technical pricing issues. This request for reconsideration is now pending before the Postal Rate Commission, after the submission by the Postal Service and the parties of comments and reply comments in December and January. Meanwhile, the rates allowed under protest were implemented on January 7, 2001. In their second Decision issued on December 5, the Governors rejected classifica-tion recommendations from the Commission pertaining to discounts for First-Class Mail, the flat-rate Priority Mail envelope and a matter related to automated Standard Mail (A). 2. Periodicals "Ride-Along" Experiment -Docket No. MC2000-1. On September 27, 1999, the Postal Service filed a case under the Commission's Experimental rules, which allow for the limited testing of a new service. Under the then-existing classification schedule, an enclosure included in mailings of Periodicals was required to pay the Standard Mail rate that would apply if the enclosure were mailed as a separate piece. Under the "ride-along" experi-ment, the enclosure pays a flat per-piece rate of 10 cents. Not only is this more affordable for mailers, it is also simpler to administer. Subsequent to the filing, the Postal Service and the mailing commu-nity reached an agreement regarding the issues of the case and filed a stipulation and agreement with the Postal Rate Commission. On February 3, 2000, the Commission recommended the classifi-cation and fee based on this agreement. The experimental classification implemented on February 26, 2000 will expire on February 20, 2002, unless it is made permanent or another experiment is put in its place. 3. NetPost Mailing Online Experiment Docket No. MC2000-2 On November 16, 1999, the Postal Service filed an experimental case requesting a recom-mended decision from the Postal Rate Commission for a Mailing Online classification and fee schedule (MC2000-2). On June 21, 2000, the Postal Rate Commission issued an Opinion and Recommended Decision, which the Governors approved on August 7, 2000, with an implementation date of September 1, 2000. The experiment will last approximately three years. Mailing Online is a hybrid mail product that permits customers to create mailings electronically. Customers design documents on their personal computers, upload the document and a mailing list to the Postal Service through the USPS.com web-site, select desired printing options and pay with a credit card. The Postal Service then combines cus-tomer jobs, presorts them sends the jobs in batches to geographically distributed printing partners. The printers create the physical mailpieces for nearby entry and delivery by the Postal Service. 4. Bulk Parcel Return Complaint Case -Docket No. C99-4 On June 9, 1999, the Continuity Shippers Association filed a complaint with the Rate Commission arguing that the fee for Bulk Parcel Return Service (BPRS) was too high. The com-plainant contended that updated cost studies showed lower costs than originally estimated and that the cost coverage should be lower than what the Commission previously established. On April 14, 2000 the Commission recommended a lower fee for BPRS based on the lower cost estimate, but maintained the cost coverage. On June 15, 2000, the Governors of the Postal Service rejected the Commission's recommended decision, noting that all costs change over time and that the Commission had failed to find the fee unlawful as required by the Act. 5. PosteCS Complaint Case - Docket No. C99-1 In October 1998, United Parcel Service (UPS) filed a complaint with the Postal Rate Commission concerning the Postal Service's provision of PosteCS, a wholly electronic, Internet-based document service designed to support secure electronic com-munications. The fundamental basis for the UPS 22 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 22•complaint is the allegation that the Postal Service is offering PosteCS to the public without first submit-ting to the Commission a request for a recommended decision on classification provisions and rates associated with this service. The complaint further alleges that provision of PosteCS at no charge on an introductory basis is contrary to the pricing standards of the Postal Reorganization Act (Act). In addition, UPS alleges that the service constitutes a "nationwide change in service" for which an advi-sory opinion must be requested under the Act. The Postal Service moved to dismiss the complaint. In its motion to dismiss, the Postal Service maintained that the Commission does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the question of whether PosteCS is a "postal" service. Even if the Commission had jurisdiction to consider the complaint, PosteCS is plainly not a "postal" service for purposes of the Commission's jurisdiction according to the defi-nitions of that term put forth by the courts, the Commission, and the Governors of the Postal Service. On May 3, 1999, the Commission issued an order denying the Postal Service's motion to dismiss and ordering further proceed-ings on the question of whether PosteCS is a "postal" service for purposes of the Commission's rate and classification jurisdiction. Throughout 2000, the Commission addressed disputes related to discovery by UPS. The complaint case is still pending before the Commission. E. Transportation Policies (39 U.S.C. 101 (e),(f )) 1. General The Postal Service spent $4.7 billion in 2000 for the contractual transportation of mail. This figure represents a 6.8 percent increase from 1999 transportation expenses. Mail transportation accounted for more than 7 percent of total postal expenses for 2000. 2. Domestic Transportation a. Air Transportation Air transportation costs in 2000 totaled $1.7 billion. These costs included the use of commercial airlines (passenger and freight) and as dedicated network and air taxi service. The Postal Service contracted with 56 commercial airlines to move more than 2.95 billion pounds of domestic mail last year. Ten of the commercial airlines handled 68 percent of the total volume. Of the almost 56,000 commercial airline flights that are available on a daily basis, the Postal Service uses approximately 15,000 for the trans-portation of mail. To supplement the movement of mail by air, the Postal Service operates its Eagle Hub in Indianapolis, IN. The hub operates a nighttime network (ANET) with 28 aircraft and serves 46 cities directly. The Eagle Hub transports more that 800,000 pounds of mail each night; 30 percent is Express Mail, 55 per-cent is Priority Mail 15 percent is First-Class Mail. The 240,000 pounds of Express Mail equates to approximately 70 percent of all Express Mail that moves by air. In addition, during the Holiday peak period, the network expands to encompass a daytime service that transports more than one million pounds of Priority Mail each day for a 13-day period. Additionally, the Postal Service operates a western dedicated network (WNET) which trans-ports more than 250,000 pounds of mail transported daily in the Western and Pacific Areas. Of the total number of pounds of mail transported daily on WNET, 12 percent is Express Mail, 48 percent is Priority Mail; and 40 percent is First-Class Mail. b. Rail Transportation Postal Service expenses for all rail trans-portation were $277 million in 2000. This represents a 2.2 percent decrease from 1999. The Postal Service holds contracts with eight railroads that perform service on approximately 1800 rail segments. In 2000, the Postal Service paid Amtrak $98 million for rail transportation services. Expanded service included using a rail/highway combination vehicle call a RoadRailer vehicle. This vehicle, has extended the reach and capability of Amtrak service to meet postal needs. The Amtrak trans-portation network provides service for the majority of Periodical Mail. c. Highway Transportation The Postal Service expended approximately $2.1 billion for highway mail transportation in 2000, a 5 percent increase over 1999. d. Hub and Spoke Program (HASP) With nine hub and spoke facilities operating nationally, intermodal operations were imple-mented when dedicated air taxi service was added Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 23 23•to the Southeast and Indianapolis HASPs in 1998. Nineteen aircraft, ranging in size from DC9s to 747s were introduced to support the HASP sur-face transportation network. These actions reduced congestion at commercial airline transfer hubs, improved service and provided a more consistent arrival profile. e. Domestic Water Transportation In 2000, the cost of transporting mail to domestic offshore destinations was $30 million, a 2 percent increase over 1999. 3. International Transportation a. International Air Transportation In 2000, the Postal Service spent $160.3 mil-lion for international air transportation. U.S. flag carriers were paid $131.5 million, and foreign flag carriers received $28.8 million. Foreign flag carriers are used for airmail service to destinations where no U.S carrier provides the required service. Selections of carriers for surface airlift contracts are awarded on the basis of best value. An additional $137.9 million was spent for military mail, which was reimbursed by the Department of Defense (DOD). b. International Surface transportation During 2000, international surface trans-portation costs were $7 million. The cost covers all surface mail sent by sea. The selection of ocean carriers is based on price and service to the required destinations. 4. Postal-Owned Transportation (See Table 1.1) 5. Mail Transport Equipment (MTE) To further our commitment to suppling our customers with quality MTE, we support a net-work of 22 Mail Transport Equipment Centers. The Mail Transportation Equipment Service Center (MTESC) program is a network of out-sourced facilities dedicated to processing, repairing, storing and redistributing sacks, trays, pallets and wheeled containers to internal and external cus-tomers. Separating MTE activities from plant activities enables mail processing managers to focus on processing mail. Under the program, emptied mail transport equipment is dispatched from a mail processing center to one of the 22 service centers via dedicated transportation. The used equipment is inspected, sorted, repaired and made ready for reuse by either internal or external customers. Over 2,000 trailer loads of mail transport equipment requests are filled each day. A profes-sional logistics contractor, managed at the national level, provides centralized coordination of inven-tory management, ordering and fulfillment, data systems and other supporting activities. The MTESC program plays an integral role in achieving the goals set forth in the 1998-2002 Strategic Plan of satisfying our customers, improving our organizational effectiveness and strengthening our financial viability. F. Postal Facilities, Equipment and Employee Working Conditions (39 U.S.C. 101 (g)) 1. Safety and Health, Safety Management Process In the second full year as a "private sector" employer under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Postal Service faced several unique challenges. As an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government of the United States, the Postal Service is operated as a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States. In 2000, the Postal Service performed this vital mission while also focusing on enhancing safety and health pro-grams in our facilities and responding to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) inspection activity in a proactive and posi-tive manner. -------------------- TABLE 1.1 Chart Title: Table 1.1: Postal Service Vehicle Inventory FY 00 Type of Chart: 2-column table, summarizing information Action or Trend: Table 1.1 presents an overview of the 211,714 vehicles operated by the Postal Service in Fiscal Year 2000. Total numbers of each of 12 types of vehicles are presented in the table. Cost to operate the 205,391 vehicles owned by the Postal Service (the remainder are leased) averages out to $4,010 per vehicle, or $0.75 per mile. --------------------- Postal management was challenged to improve safety and health programs beyond basic compli-ance to involve employees and their representatives. To measure this performance, management con-ducted the most comprehensive third-party evaluation of nationwide safety and health programs ever undertaken. As a part of the EVA Variable Pay Program targets as detailed previously in chapter 1, an independent safety and health firm conducted program evaluations in 252 large postal facilities nationwide. These facilities were selected randomly by the firm. The evaluations were conducted in an objective manner independent of postal manage-ment. The third-party experts utilized a safety and health Program Evaluation Guide (PEG) developed specifically for the Postal Service. It was based on OSHA guidance and industry best practices. All Areas met the PEG threshold goal of a sound safety and health program. Many facilities far exceeded basic program elements. There was a dra-matic improvement in management involvement, employee participation and OSHA-required written programs. This was demonstrated by increased emphasis on Executive and Joint Labor Management Safety and Health Committees. Additionally the national EVA goal for lost workday injuries and illnesses was met. The Postal Service continued to focus on motor vehicle safety. In conjunction with the National Safety Council (NSC), over 135,000 Postal Service drivers were recognized with NSC Safe Driver Awards. The Postal Service deployed several national driver safety campaigns including "schools out," "pedestrian safety," "winter driving" and "schools in" designed to increase driver aware-ness and reduce motor vehicle accidents. The Postal Service also partnered with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention (3D) month cam-paign. The first corporate-wide seat belt use survey was accomplished utilizing the postal Web site. Seat belt use data were shared with the U.S. Department of Transportation in support of the "Buckle Up America" Campaign. The Postal Service continued to work with OSHA in a proactive manner on compliance activi-ties. This included the prompt and thorough investigation of employee complaints relative to safety and health and the appropriate resolution of cited deficiencies. 2. Environmental Programs a. Fuel Cell, Anchorage, AK On August 9, 2000, Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Postmaster General William J. Henderson dedicated the nation's largest com-mercial fuel cell system at the Anchorage Processing & Distribution Center. The system is energy efficient and environ-mentally friendly. Producing one megawatt of electricity, this is the first fuel cell system that provides power to the utility grid - Alaska's Chugach Electric. Fuel cell systems offer one of the lowest-maintenance forms of electrical power in the world. As businesses and the Internet create a greater demand for uninterrupted power, fuel cells are becoming a cost-effective alternative. This project demonstrates fuel cell resource flexibility and commercial viability for meeting today's crit-ical power needs. Fuel cells do not burn fuel so the system eliminates air emissions normally associated with acid rain and smog dramatically reducing those associated with global warming. Compared with electricity generated from the average combustion-based processes in the United States, a one-megawatt fuel cell system would elimi-nate more than 200,000 pounds of air pollution and 11 million pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere during each year of operation. b. Green Electricity Just in time for Earth Day 2000, the Postal Service announced one of the largest purchases of retail green power in U.S. history. The Postal Service awarded a competitively-bid contract to go-green. com, the retail operation of Preferred Energy Services, Inc. to provide 100 percent green power to 1,000 Postal Service facilities throughout California over a three-year period. The contract called for delivery of more than 30 million kilowatt hours of electricity from renewable energy resources for each of the next three years. This purchase of 100 percent green power for more than 1,100 facilities in California demon-strates our commitment to conducting business in a socially responsible manner. By doing this, we remained true to our values while accomplishing Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 25 25•two very important things: the acquisition of a cost-effective energy source and the opportunity to make a contribution to the environmental health of the communities we serve. The use of renewable energy resources - instead of the traditional mix of resources - to generate 30 million kilowatt hours annually will save about 25 million pounds of carbon dioxide, 60,000 pounds of oxides of nitrogen and 18,000 pounds of sulfur dioxide each year from being released into the atmosphere. The Postal Service received technical assistance from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in developing the solicitation and evaluating the offers received that led to this purchase. With 40,000 facilities nationwide, the Postal Service is the largest federal consumer of electricity other than the mili-tary and plans to deploy 500 electric delivery vehicles in California next year. c. Benign Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives In March 2000 the Postal Service announced the development of an environmen-tally benign Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive (PSA), marking the beginning of a new era in recycling. This world-class technology will help make recycling more economical, help decrease costs for recycling and repulping operations and help divert tons of valuable waste paper from our nation's landfills. For years it has been known as the "sticky" problem. What do you do with adhe-sives when recycling paper? These adhesives gum up the works and recycling mills have difficulty recycling paper with high adhesive content. But through the leadership of the Postal Service and cooperation between the public and private sector, the "sticky" problem may soon be a thing of the past. Not only will this new adhesive technology improve the environmental performance of postage stamps, it will also reach a much larger audience of adhesive users. On April 21, 2000, President Clinton issued Executive Order 13148, a "Greening the Govern-ment" Executive Order that recommended all federal agencies employ the new PSA technology. The Postal Service has a long history of leadership in recycling efforts and protection of the environment. Although stamps were a very small part of the "sticky" problem, the Postal Service saw an opportunity for public policy leadership and took on the task of developing an environmentally friendly adhesive. In 1994, the Environmentally Benign Pressure Sensitive Adhesives Program was initiated as part of the Postal Service's commitment to develop stamps and stamp products that do not adversely affect the environment. Previously, the Postal Service formed a team of researchers from government and industry, including members of the Forest Products Laboratory (U. S. Department of Agriculture), the adhesive industry, paper manu-facturers, recyclers, printers and testing laboratories. This research partnership, spon-sored and funded by the Postal Service, has been successful in creating an environmentally friendly adhesive. It passed a comprehensive series of tests, meeting all Postal Service stamp performance and recycling requirements. d. Per Scholas In April 2000, the Postal Service announced its partnership with Per Scholas in the South Bronx to provide computers to inner-city youth and families. Per Scholas is a non-profit organization dedicated to bridging the digital divide by bringing 21st-century technology to school children and low-income families. The Postal Service is partnering with Per Scholas to recycle stand-alone computer systems by donating 15,000 units for recycling as well as providing postal vehicles to transport com-puters for reconditioning to the Center and distributing the refurbished units to families without home computers. This partnership with Per Scholas offers the Postal Service yet another opportunity to be a leader in the voluntary takeback move-ment and to reaffirm our commitment to the diverse communities that we serve, everywhere, every day. Started by a consortium of foundations and corporations, Per Scholas - which comes from the Latin phrase, "For Schools" - produces high-quality computers for schools and other non-profit organizations at substantial savings. In the last four years, it has placed more than 13,000 computers in over 1,200 schools in 22 states. Per Scholas also offers comprehensive computer techology training and job placement for disadvantaged youth. At its new recycling center, Per Scholas has expanded its operations to include reconditioning computers donated by the Postal Service and other organizations and placing them in disadvantaged homes through social service agencies. Per Scholas projects that 26 Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 26•Chapter 1 Compliance with Statutory Policies 27 it will provide 10,000 of these computer pack-ages each year. e. Resource Recovery from Obsolete Equipment with Goodwill, Austin, TX For several years, the Postal Service has been a leader in electronics equipment reutilization - the process of salvaging value from discarded computers and other electronics equipment. Austin, Texas, has become a magnet for high-tech firms and consequently has become a hotbed of creative approaches to dealing with discarded high-tech equipment. The Postal Service spotted an opportunity in Austin to break new ground in materials management. In 1998, Goodwill Industries of Central Texas in Austin, established a facility to receive discarded electronic equipment such as Integrated Retail Terminals (IRTs). It dismantles them for harvesting of usable parts, or utilizes the remaining materials as recyclable scrap. The USPS/Goodwill program receives approximately 325,000 pounds of equipment (abou